HEBREW WORD STUDY – ADAM’S GARMENTS – BEGAD ADAM בגרnאדמ
Genesis 27:15,27: “And Rebekah took goodly raiment of her eldest son Esau, which [were] with her in the house, and put them upon Jacob her younger son: 27 And he came near, and kissed him: and he smelled the smell of his raiment, and blessed him, and said, See, the smell of my son [is] as the smell of a field which the LORD hath blessed:”
You remember the story of Easu and Jacob from Sunday School and how Jacob and his mother plotted to deceived Jacob’s father into giving him his brother Easu’s inheritance by Jacob dressing up in his brother’s clothes.
The word for garment or raiment in Hebrew is the word begad which is really not the word for garment at all but is the word for treachery and deceit. Semitic storytelling is filled with metaphoric language and it is most likely begad is used metaphorically for clothes worn for deceitful purpose like stealing a birthright. There is evidence in ancient literature that begad is used to express something else. It is possible these were not Esau’s garments but garments Esau obtained through a treacherous act, that is the killing of Nimrod. In fact, the Mishnah Rabbah teaches that these were the garments stolen from Nimrod when Esau ambushed him in the field. But why steal his clothes?
On a recent visit to the University of Chicago’s library, I wasted a whole afternoon reading an ancient book called the Book of Jasher. The book of Jasher, is not part of the canon nor is it inspired Scripture and may just be a book of urban legends, however, many Jewish rabbis will attest to a degree of historical accuracy.
In the Book of Jasper the 27th chapter, we see some gaps in the story of Esau being filled. It is believed that as the story of the creation was passed down orally, the original garments that God gave Adam to wear still existed and was in Nimrod’s possession. Apparently, as the legend goes, the garments given to Adam by God were given to Enoch which was given to Methuselah who handed them down to Noah who gave them to his son Ham and eventually worked their way into the hands of Nimrod. By this time legend grew up that these garments contained some mystical powers.
Such a garment would be considered as sacred as the Shroud of Turin and I am sure the authenticity would be just as questionable. But suppose the garments of Adam did survive until the time of Esau or someone put together a garment and called it Adams garments. People would assume and/or someone would convince others it had special powers. It is believed that Esau coveted these garments and with the blessing of his father Isaac sought to steal them and in the process got into fight and Esau ended up murdering Nimrod and taking off with Adam’s alleged garments. Of course, it would be these garments he would wear when he was to receive the blessing from Abraham. Surely, with the garment of Adam God would double and maybe triple His blessing. Of course, now that Jacob was planning his coup, what better way to ensure God’s blessing than to wear the sacred, blessed garments of Adam.
To be honest, I don’t know where I am going with this. Maybe I am just trying to convince myself that I didn’t waste a perfectly good afternoon studying the writings of some ancient storyteller trying to build a platform with a lot of myth. But you know what, the whole idea of relics having mystical powers and people killing others to possess these relics is not an ancient one. Hitler kill thousands of people in his quest for the Spear of Destiny because he actually believed that if he possessed it he would be invincible. Some years ago a movie called the Raiders of the Lost Ark spurred the imagination of millions of Christians over the thought of recovering the lost Ark of the Covenant and the powers it might contain. It’s a box, for crying out loud, just a box. It would have great historical and archaeological significance but that is all.
People want to see what they worship. They need an idol, a relic, a thing that they can touch and see. They want a preacher to pray over them because they can see the preacher. They want a beautiful church building because that they can see it. Before long they begin to believe that the preacher has special powers or that God will surely bless them more if they attend church in a building designated for worship. I remember as a pastor I had a person ask for prayer. I was in his home and I immediately reached out to pray and he stopped me and said: “No, no, let’s go to the church to pray. I want this to be a good prayer.” I’m thinking: “Good prayers are all I got buddy.”
My point is, we worship God with our hearts, not our eyes.
The purpose of the Shroud of Turin was not that it was supposed to be used as a relic. Its purpose was not that it was proof of the crucifixion of Jesus. Many at that time were crucified. Rather it is proof that Jesus rose from the dead. The carbon dating proved nothing, because the Vatican purposely cut samples from the part that had been repaired. Maybe not everyone at the Vatican are evil, but there are many that are. They purposely wanted the proof that Jesus had risen from the dead hidden from the world. The Shroud of Turin is ultimate proof that Jesus is literally The Light. The Shroud of Turin was created with laser light and produced a 3d image of how His Body was resurrected. How do I know this? With gloves on, I personally removed each negative of the hundreds of photos taken by the Shroud of Turin research team and placed them under a computerized camera so that they could be put in a digital format. I have seen the blood cells of Jesus. I had been through a heartbreaking divorce and much emotional trauma, but just being in the presence of the photographs caused me to be in the presence of Jesus and I was healed. Like Thomas, there are many today that want proof about Jesus. The Shroud of Turin is proof!!! And the enemy is preventing that proof from being shown to the world.
What? Esau killed Nimrod. I have never heard anything like this.
I have read The Two Babylon’s by
Alexander Hislop.
I learned from Hislop that Nimrod died a sudden and horrible death possibly an act of God through Shem.
Are either one of these stories credible?
I think the book of Jasher is every bit as inspired as the rest of scripture. Jasher is the second witness of Genesis (Bereshith), “at the mouth of two or three witnesses let a thing be established”. Jasher is referred to in “cannonized” scripture several times. Besides, who is it that decided on which books to accept and “cannonize”? Man – fallible, personal agenda having men! There are many fantastical things described in Jasher, but no more fantastic than parting a sea, talking donkeys, the entirety of creation housed in a big boat, men living for 900 years, etc., that are described in the Bible! Women’s involvement in events are also given much more prime time mention in Jasher, which I’m sure was an affront to the 100% male Nicean counsel and probably one of the reasons for it being discarded. I’ve read Jasher completely twice and I see only a few minor contradictions to the Genesis record. Some will say, it has not been preserved like Scripture, however; we know that Scripture has been monkeyed with by man in many places. For instance, the account of the woman caught in adultery (John 8) was added at least 200 years after Yeshua and was not in the earlier manuscripts. So, how can we say one is preserved and the other is not or one is valid and the other is not? I think to do that we fall victim to the arrogance of man who always thinks he knows better than Yahweh.
👍👍🙌
Good insight,an afternoon well spent and shared,tks